call for a free consultation 800-615-6595

AS SEEN ON

Farar & Lewis LLP is a top rated law firm, with over 40 years of combined experience. Our attorneys have won over $100 million, in combined verdicts and settlements for our clients. You deserve compensation for your pain and suffering, and it's our job to get it for you.

Los Angeles

Personal Injury Lawyers

01

Personal Attention

At Farar & Lewis LLP, we pride ourselves on our ability to be there for our clients, 24/7 when tragedy or questions arise. Every single one of our clients has access to their assigned lawyer.
02

Respected Los Angeles Car Accident Lawyers

We’re proud to say that our personal injury lawyers in Los Angeles, are recognized as leaders in the state of California. Our firm has won millions, in compensation for our clients.
03

No Fee Ever. Unless We Win.

Our Los Angeles personal injury attorneys are on your team. That means we’re with you 100% of the way. We prove this, by never charging any upfront fees.
04

Risk Free Consultation. No Upfront Fees-

It's simple. There's NO upfront fee for our services. We offer a risk free consultation.

A Practice Dedicated Exclusively To Helping Injury Victims

If you have been injured in an auto accident or another type of accident that you did not cause, it is important that you seek the advice of a qualified California personal injury attorney who knows the law and has the ability to secure the compensation you deserve. At the law firm of Farar & Lewis LLP, we represent Southern California clients through some of the most difficult times of their lives.

We know how overwhelming it can be for injury victims to deal with overzealous insurance adjusters who want to settle their claims for as little as possible. We take the burden of the legal issues off your shoulders and work directly with the insurance company to negotiate a settlement that provides the medical care and financial support necessary to facilitate your recovery. If a fair settlement cannot be negotiated, we will take your case to court.

Our Iron-Clad Commitment To YOU

We are committed to you and your right to no-nonsense legal representation, timely communication and full compensation. We pride ourselves on providing punctual and honest case assessments.

Our team of trial lawyers has over 40 years of combined experience, fighting on behalf of victims all over the state of California. get a free consultation

RECENT CASE RESULTS

Motorcyclist Suffers From Automobile Accident
600,000.00
SETTLEMENT
Premises Liability/Trip and Fall
300,000
SETTLEMENT
Premises Liability/Trip and Fall
1,300,000.00
SETTLEMENT
Auto vs. Auto
500,000
SETTLEMENT
Pedestrian suffers from automobile accident
240,000.00
SETTLEMENT
risk free consultation

What If I Was Partially At Fault in the Car Accident?

Determining fault is the primary method of deciding who is liable to cover the costs of any damages that result from a car accident. However, things are frequently not so simple and straightforward, and it’s often the case that both parties will be at least partially at fault for an accident. Should this be the case, being partially at fault for a car accident will usually affect your ability to receive full compensation for any damages and it could potentially disqualify you from receiving compensation entirely.

Comparative Fault vs. Contributory Fault
Each state has its own laws regarding traffic accidents, which means where the crash occurred will directly determine how the courts view fault when allocating damages. Many states work under the principle of comparative fault, also known as comparative negligence. Under this rule, the judge or jury basically determines the specific level of fault that lies with each party and then uses this to allocate the damages proportionally.

For instance, the court might determine that the accident was 20 percent your fault and 80 percent the fault of the other driver. In this case, the other driver would be responsible for paying 80 percent of the total cost of the damage to your vehicle. Crucially though, the fact that the court determined that the accident was 20 percent your fault means you will also be forced to pay for 20 percent of the damages to the other vehicle.

Although the majority of states use either a pure or modified form of comparative fault when allocating damages, there are still a number of places that operate under the principle of contributory negligence. In Washington D.C., Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina and Virginia, the contributory negligence principle means that you are not entitled to any compensation if the court determines you were at all at fault for the accident. Under contributory negligence laws, a victim is not entitled to collect any compensation or damages if the accident was even 1 percent their own fault. This obviously has devastating effects on a victim’s ability to seek compensation, which is why the majority of states have abandoned this law in favor of comparative fault.

How is Comparative Fault Determined?
Depending on where the accident occurred, the state might allocate damages under the principle of pure comparative fault or modified comparative fault. Under the principle of pure comparative fault, both drivers are liable to pay for their share of the other’s damages in proportion to their fault for the accident. This works exactly as described in the example above where the driver received 80 percent of their own damages and had to pay 20 percent of the other driver’s damages.

New York is one state that follows the principle of pure comparative fault, and this can have both positive and negative effects when seeking compensation following a car accident. On one hand, it ensures that you will be entitled to damages even if the other person was only partially at fault. However, it also means that the other person’s attorney will likely do whatever they can to convince the judge or jury that the accident was your fault. For this reason, you’ll want to make sure you hire an experienced personal injury attorney to help defend your interests.

Still, only 13 states use pure comparative fault when allocating damages, whereas 33 states currently use some form of modified comparative fault. Under modified comparative fault, the state sets a fault threshold, which essentially means that only the person who was at less fault for the accident receives compensation. Some states operate under a 50 percent bar while others set the bar at 51 percent.

In states that use the 50 percent rule, a person cannot receive compensation if the court determines that they were 50 percent or more at fault for the accident. On the other hand, states that use the 51 percent rule allow a person to receive compensation if the court determines that the accident was 50 percent their fault or less. While one percent may not sound like much, it actually makes a huge difference. In states that use the 51 percent bar, both parties are entitled to 50 percent of the damages if the court determines they were equally at fault. However, in states that use the other rule, neither party is entitled to damages if they are both at equal fault.

The fact that determining fault can be such a complicated issue means it is essential that you speak with a professional personal injury attorney immediately following the accident. Any statements you make to the other driver’s insurance company or lawyer could potentially harm your case. By speaking immediately to an attorney, you’ll be able to get advice on how best to proceed without risking your chances of receiving a settlement.

Top Rated Personal
Injury Lawyers

Fill out the form to schedule a free consultation